Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¹¼ÒµµÆ÷¿ë ºÒ¼ÒÁ¦Àç¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ Ç¥¸éº¯È­¿Í ±× Àû¿ë½Ã°¢¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¸°­³» ºÒ¼Ò ÀÜ·ù·®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A STUDY ON THE ORAL FLUORIDE RETENTION AND SURFACE CHANGE OF RESIN RESTORATION FOLLOWING APPLICATION DF VARIOUS TOPICAL FLUORIDE AGENTS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1996³â 23±Ç 1È£ p.274 ~ 289
±è°æ¿ø, ÃÖ¿ëö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è°æ¿ø (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³º´¿ø ÀÀ±ÞÀÇÇаú±³½Ç
ÃÖ¿ëö (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±¹¼ÒµµÆ÷¿ë ºÒ¼ÒÁ¦ÀçÀÇ ¹°¸®ÀûÇüÅÂ¿Í Àû¿ë½Ã°£ÀÌ ±¸°­³» ºÒ¼ÒÀÜ·ù·®°ú º¹ÇÕ·¹
Áø ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ Ç¥¸é¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú¿¡ ³»
¿øÇÑ 3-6¼¼ÀÇ ¾Æµ¿ 40¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 1.23%ÀÇ APF foam°ú gel µµÆ÷Á¦¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© 1ºÐ ¶Ç´Â
4ºÐ°£ ºÒ¼Ò ±¹¼ÒµµÆ÷¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑÈÄ ºÒ¼ÒÀÇ ±¸°­³» ÀÜ·ù·®À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´°í, º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø Ç¥º»À» Á¦
ÀÛÇÏ¿© APF Á¦À縦 µµÆ÷ÇÑ ÈÄ °¢°¢ Ç¥º»¹«°ÔÀÇ °¨¼ÒÄ¡¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ±× Ç¥¸éÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÁÖ»ç
ÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î °üÂûÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Gel-typeÀÇ ±¹¼ÒµµÆ÷¿ë ºÒ¼Ò Á¦ÀçÀÇ »ç¿ëÀÌ foam-type¿¡ ºñÇØ Àû¿ë ½Ã°£¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ
³ôÀº ±¸°­³» ÀÜ·ù·®À» ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸¸ç(p<0.05), gel-type°£¿¡¼­´Â 1ºÐ µµÆ÷¿¡ ºñÇØ 4ºÐ µµÆ÷±º¿¡
¼­ ³ôÀº ±¸°­³» ÀÜ·ù·®À» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù(p<0.05).
2. ºÒ¼Ò ±¹¼ÒµµÆ÷¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø Ç¥º»ÀÇ weight lossÀÇ ¾çÀº µµÆ÷ Á¦ÀçÀÇ physical
form(gel vs foam)¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ 1ºÐ µµÆ÷¿¡ ºñÇØ 4ºÐ µµÆ÷½Ã À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç
(p<0.05), µµÆ÷¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ·¹Áø Ç¥¸é º¯È­´Â 1ºÐ µµÆ÷¿¡ ºñÇØ Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ surface roughnessÀÇ Áõ
°¡¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
3. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î ¹Ì·ç¾î º¼ ¶§, ºÒ¼Ò ±¹¼Ò µµÆ÷½Ã ¹ß»ý °¡´ÉÇÑ Àü½ÅÀû ¼·Ãë·®À» °¨¼Ò½ÃÅ°
°í ¶ÇÇÑ ·¹Áø ¼öº¹¹° Ç¥¸éÀ» º¸È£Çϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â foam-type ºÒ¼Ò Á¦ÀçÀÇ 1ºÐ µµÆ÷°¡ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷
ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The aim of this study is to determine the influence of topical fluoride on the resin
surface and oral fluoride retention following the application of various topical fluorides.
We compared the oral retention of foam-type topical fluoride agents with gel-type in
the clinical setting. 40 children were participated in this study and the topical fluoride
agents used were 1.23% APF for the experimental and NaF for the control group.
The results obtained were follows :
1. Foam-type showed higher amount of oral fluoride retention than gel-type regardless
of application time and 4-minute application of gel-type showed higher oral retention
than that of 1-minute.
2. Significantly greater weight loss of resin was found in 4-minute group than
1-minute group regardless of physical form of topical fluoride, and resin surface treated
4-minute APF showed the general increase in surface roughness than 1-minute group.
3. 1-minute application of foam-type fluoride agent may be recommended to decrease
the possible systemic ingestion and protect the surface of resin restoration.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI